Many people today struggle with finding or staying with a religion. This isn’t a new problem. Many people, especially important people, sometimes struggled with this. Elizabeth I, Queen of England was one of these.
In the 16th Century, while Elizabeth I, was able to create a system of order and a thriving economy with low taxes in her England. Being queen for 45 years probably helped too! I’m sure many people were happy to have Elizabeth as their queen. However, she struggled to pick a religion for her country to use. Did she want Protestantism? Or would she try something relatively new? Did she want Catholicism? If she did, she would have to share power with the Catholic church which was not what she wanted to do. She most definitely wanted to be absolutist or the only one in charge of church and state. But, Catholicism was the religion that was accepted by previous monarchs. And although, she did like some views of the Catholic church, she was reluctant to share any power. She abandoned trying to choose between Protestantism or Catholicism and chose, instead, the religion of Anglicanism. She even forced Ireland to abandon Catholicism and have Anglicanism as their religion. They had no choice.
Unfortunately, this confirms one of humankind’s major weaknesses: That powerful people will often do anything to keep their power and have it all. In Queen Elizabeth’s case, there’s a good chance that she didn’t believe in or truly want Anglicanism for England — except as a wise political move. Maybe she just did it to avoid the Catholics and to keep the Protestants ‘Okay’ with her decision. Looking back, history must ask if she ever picked a national religion for the benefit of her people? Or just to stay in power? Maybe she felt it was both.